The Workspace as a source of hierarchy in extended projections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7557/12.7982Keywords:
Workspace, extended projection, category, feature, formative, hierarchy of projectionsAbstract
Extended projections (EPs) in natural languages have several properties which have not yet been explained. (i) EPs conform to a Hierarchy of Projections (HoP), a crosslinguistically similar hierarchical arrangement of semantically grounded categories. (ii) Each token of an EP is linear, in the sense that it has a single dimension (with specifiers and adjuncts stripped out, it is a string). (iii) HoPs are rooted in a lexical category with conceptual content at the bottom, and a succession of functional elements above. I argue that these properties motivate a particular architecture of the workspaces in which sentences are constructed. I model the workspace as a Finite State Automaton (FSA) with a monotonicity property which underpins hierarchy. The FSA starts from a lexical category (cf. (iii)), `projecting' it into an EP. Transitions correspond to applications of Merge, and states are stages in the derivation. The sequence of states in a path from start to accepting state is a string, the EP (cf. (ii)). The HoP is then the entire FSA, arranged with the start at the bottom and the final state, the complete clause or noun phrase, at the top (cf. (i)).
References
Aboh, Enoch Oladé. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001
Ackema, Peter, Ad Neeleman, and Fred Weerman. 1993. Deriving functional projections. In North East Linguistics Society, vol. 23, pp. art. 3 (1–15).
Adger, David. 2013. A Syntax of Substance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226714000073. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226714000073
Barwise, Jon and John Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. MIT press, Cambridge, Ma.
Blanco, Mercedes Tubino. 2011. Causatives in Minimalism. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.179. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.179
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals. The Linguistic Review 25 1-2: 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.005
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tromsø.
Carden, Guy. 1983. The non-finite=state-ness of the word formation component. Linguistic Inquiry 14 3: 537–541.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton, ’s-Gravenhage. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36 3: 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917
Culbertson, Jennifer, Marieke Schouwstra, and Simon Kirby. 2020. From the world to word order: Deriving biases in noun phrase order from statistical properties of the world. Language 96 3: 696–717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0045. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0045
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht.
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001
Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Diminutives as heads or specifiers: The mapping between syntax and phonology. IBERIA: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 5 1: 1–44.
Graf, Thomas. 2019. Monotonicity as an effective theory of morphosyntactic variation. Journal of Language Modelling 7 2: 3–47. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v7i2.211. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v7i2.211
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language. Report of a Conference Held at Dobbs Ferry, NY, April 13-15, 1961, edited by Joseph H. Greenberg, pp. 73–113. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projections. Ms. Brandeis University.
Grimshaw, Jane. 2005. Extended projection. In Words and Structure, edited by Jane Grimshaw, pp. 1–73. CSLI, Stanford, Ca. Revised version of 1991 ms.
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1997. Modularity in a configurational theta theory. In Projections and Interface Conditions: Essays on Modularity, edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo, pp. 155–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195104141.003.0007
Hankamer, Jorge. 1989. Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In Lexical Representation and Process, edited by William Marslen-Wilson, pp. 392–408. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4213.003.0018
Hengeveld, Kees. 1990. The hierarchical structure of utterances. In Layers and Levels of Representation in Language Theory, edited by Jan Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, , and Co Vet, pp. 1–24. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.13.03hen
Holmberg, Anders, Urpo Nikanne, Irmeli Oraviita, Hannu Reime, and Trond Trosterud. 1993. The structure of INFL and the finite clause in Finnish. In Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax, edited by Anders Holmberg and Urpo Nikanne, Studies in Generative Grammar, pp. 177–206. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110902600.177
Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht.
Koeneman, Olaf. 2010. Verb movement in Germanic and Celtic languages: A flexible approach. Lingua 120 2: 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.006
Koskenniemi, Kimmo. 1983. Two-level Morphology: A general computational model for word-form recognition and production. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. https://doi.org/10.3115/980431.980529
Larson, Richard K. 2021. Rethinking Cartography. Language 97 2: 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0018. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0018
Lohndal, Terje. 2014. Phrase Structure and Argument Structure: A Case Study of the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677115.001.0001
Oseki, Yohei and Alec Marantz. 2020. Modeling human morphological competence. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 513740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513740
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its Failures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001
Ramchand, Gillian and Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46 B: 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013
Rijkhoff, J. 2002. The Noun Phrase. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001
Roark, Brian and Richard Sproat. 2007. Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199274772.001.0001. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199274772.001.0001
Scontras, Gregory, Judith Degen, and Noah D Goodman. 2017. Subjectivity predicts adjective ordering preferences. Open Mind 1 1: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00005. https://doi.org/10.1162/OPMI_a_00005
Son, Minjeong and Peter Svenonius. 2008. Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, pp. 388–396. Cascadilla, Somerville, Ma.
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Merge, project, and bundle. Ms. CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter. 2016a. Complex predicates as complementation structures. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, edited by Léa Nash and Pollet Samvelian, pp. 212–247. Koninklijke Brill, Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004307094_009. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004307094_009
Svenonius, Peter. 2016b. Spans and words. In Morphological Metatheory, edited by Heidi Harley and Daniel Siddiqi, pp. 199–220. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.07sve. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.07sve
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, edited by Samuel David Epstein and Norbert Hornstein, pp. 251–282. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139833899. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2024. Constituency in Cup’ik and the problem of holophrasis. In Constituency and Convergence in the Americas, edited by Adam J. R. Tallman, Sandra Auderset, and Hiroto Uchihara, pp. 83–136. Language Science Press, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13208542.
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908329. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908329
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Svenonius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
