On Projecting Causality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/12.7970

Keywords:

cause, causation, Mandarin, Chinese, extended projection

Abstract

Causation is familiar as a meaning component in the V-domain, but it can also be found in the C-domain, as witnessed by a variety of wh-adverbial, reflexive adverbial and light verb construals in Mandarin. This paper explores the idea that a loosely organized hierarchy of causality can be stretched from the first phase (i.e., the V-domain) up to the second phase (i.e., the C-domain) along the clausal spine according to the analyticity setting of Chinese. It is shown that all the causality construals under investigation here displays a systematic correspondence between their distributions and interpretations in cartographic terms. We also draw on evidence from non-canonical usages of how-expressions across languages to demonstrate that the “height of interpretation” does matter at the syntax-semantics interface.

Author Biography

Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai, National Tsing Hua University

Distinguished Professor of Linguistics at the Institute of Linguistics, National Tsing Hua University.

References

Belletti, Adriana, 2005. Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17.1: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1 https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1

Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi. 2012. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, edited by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003

Feng, Shengli. 2003. Light verb syntax in Classical Chinese. Paper presented at the Conference on Research and Pedagogy in Classical Chinese and Chinese Language History. Columbia University, New York.

Fujii, Tomohiro, Kensuke Takita, Barry Chung-Yu Yang, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai. 2014. Comparative remarks on wh-adverbials in situ in Japanese and Chinese. In Japanese Syntax in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mamoru Saito, pp. 181-205. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0007 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0007

Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Huang, C.-T. James. 1994. Verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2: 587-613.

Huang, C.-T. James. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3: 45-89.

Huang, C.-T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29:423-509. https://doi.org/10.6503/THJCS

Huang, C.-T. James. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, edited by Li, Y.-H. Audrey, Andrew Simpson, and W.-T. Dylan Tsai, pp. 1-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001

Legate, Julie. 2010. On how how is used instead of that. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9088-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9088-y

Leu, Thomas. 2008. What for internally. Syntax 11 1: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00113.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00113.x

Liefke, Kristina. 2021. Non-Manner ‘how’-Complements in English and in German. In Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 25. London. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.954

Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

Nye, Rachel. 2013. How Complement Clauses Distribute: Complementiser-how and the Case against Clause-type. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Gent.

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1993.tb00295.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1993.tb00295.x

Parsons, Terence. 1995. Thematic relations and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 635-62.

Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111-134. https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1303 https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1303

Platzack, Christer. 2000. Multiple interfaces. In Cognitive Interfaces: Constraints on Linking Cognitive Information, edited by Nikanne, Urpo and Emile van der Zee, pp. 21–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198299615.003.0002 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198299615.003.0002

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319

Ramchand, Gillian and Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46 B: 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013

Reinhart, Tanya. 2003. The Theta System: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28.3: 229–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229 https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.28.3.229

Shen, Yeshayahu. 1985. The Structure of Action in the Short Narrative Text. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Shlonsky Ur and Gabriela Soare. 2011. Where's why? Linguistic Inquiry 42.4: 651-669. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064

Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Xingshi Hanyu Jufaxue [Formal Chinese Syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 83-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. In The Cartography of Chinese Syntax, edited by Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai, pp. 1-32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210687.003.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210687.003.0001

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2019. Causality, comitativity, contrastivity, and selfhood. In Interfaces in Grammar, edited by Jianhua Hu and Haihua Pan, pp. 101-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.15.05tsa https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.15.05tsa

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2022. A guide to construct non-canonical wh-questions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL‐28, online), Chinese University of Hong Kong, May 2022.

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan and Ching-Yu Helen Yang. 2022. On the syntax of mirativity: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in Honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li, edited by Andrew Simpson, pp. 431-444. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa

Umbach, Carla, Stefan Hinterwimmer, and Helmar Gust. 2022. German wie-complements: Manners, methods and events in progress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 40: 307-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09508-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09508-z

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31