The Development of Decision Support Systems in the 1960s as Antecedent of “AI-Rationality”

Authors

  • Rolf F. Nohr HBK Braunschweig

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6173

Abstract

The decision making process in a given game is usually organized in binary form and oriented toward a final and finite set of goals. This determinative action shapes the game on both formal and ludological levels. At the same time, however, the computer (or better, the algorithm) is also a decision making machine: the deeply logical calculus of the code and the program do not seem to know any 'perhaps'—the system works (literally) according to the logic of 'or', which represents one of the central elements of digital computing. The decision rationality of computers (at the heart of computer games) is characterized by simplification, reduction, symbolic coding, and also by a dynamic of action and reaction (in the sense of decision and consequence). Such observations about the consequential logic of game-based AI inevitably lead to one grand question: Who is the primary decision maker in games—the player or the machine?

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
12%
33%
Days to publication 
89
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Septentrio Academic Publishing

Downloads

Published

2020-04-21

How to Cite

Nohr, R. F. (2020) “The Development of Decision Support Systems in the 1960s as Antecedent of ‘AI-Rationality’”, Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 10(1), pp. 67–90. doi: 10.7557/23.6173.

Issue

Section

Perspectives